[email protected] Sig Runarsson

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Envelope-to:
Delivery-date: Sat, 18 May 2019 18:11:52 -0700
Received: from fieldsmagic.com ([153.122.149.14]:52089)
by with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.89)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1hSAMb-0005PP-Kk
for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 18:11:52 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (ip-174-152-83-31.chcgil.spcsdns.net [174.152.83.31])
(authenticated bits=0)
by fieldsmagic.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x4J0qSb6017844;
Sun, 19 May 2019 10:09:24 +0900
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: Mail message body
To: Recipients <[email protected]>
From: "SC Metals OU" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 03:09:31 +0200
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.4
X-Spam-Score: 104
X-Spam-Bar: ++++++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.

Content preview: Good Day I hope my email meets you well. I wrote you on behalf
of my Company a while ago with respect to a portfolio we have dedicated to
growth set up exclusively for investing outside of the eurozone. I am writing
to apologise for what seemed to be our inability to follow up with our earlier
request to you. [...]

Content analysis details: (10.4 points, 7.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.0 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[153.122.149.14 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
anti-forgery methods
2.1 FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject: ***SPAM*** Our portfolio - revisited.

Good Day

I hope my email meets you well.

I wrote you on behalf of my Company a while ago with respect to a portfolio we have
dedicated to growth set up exclusively for investing outside of the eurozone. I am
writing to apologise for what seemed to be our inability to follow up with our
earlier request to you.

My Co-signer on the all documentation related to the project fell sick again, his
cancer relapsed so he was admitted back in hospital. We thought it would be for just
1 month or so but it went on for several months and It would be insensitive, if not
inhumane to speak of business issues during such a trying time for his family.

He is better now and insists we go ahead with the project, hence my reaching out to
you once more, please let us know if you still want to proceed or if you have
changed your previous position.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincrely

Sig Runarsson

Director
SC Metals OU

Tallinn.


<< e-mail transmission>>

Good Day,

We are a european company in the process of shutting down our operations in the
Baltics and as a member of the board, I have been given a mandate by the other
directors to replace one of our Directors who lives in France.

We have a portfolio dedicated for growth even in areas outside of the eurozone and I
have a mandate from the board to work with an individual or company that is able to
provide a strategic vehicle to grow this portfolio under their professional
expertise.

We are looking for suitable individuals/companies with proof of competence to
provide a reasonable ROI; short term & long term scenarios are accommodated. Please
contact me by email for more details.

Sincerely

Sig Runarsson

Director
SC Metals OU

Tallinn city, Harju county, 10151